← GA@AGC Abyssal Heaven Store Championships

Water FractalTier 2

at GA@AGC Abyssal Heaven Store Championships

decks
8 (18.6% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
30 12-14-4
overall winrate
46.7%
ELO-adjusted winrate
42.9% avg ELO -2.6 per match
expected value
47.2% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
45.4% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill · average
mean ELO 1295 · median 1236 · range 1047–1513 (8 pilots with an ELO rating)
1047 Q1 1210 Q3 1401 1525
38% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 38% in the bottom.
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Water Genbu 16.3% 7 2-4-1 35.7% 40.9% 38.5% -5.8
Wind Astra Cleric 14.0% 2 1-0-1 75.0% 58.3% 55.9% +5.7
Wind Shadowstrike 14.0% 6 2-4-0 33.3% 40.0% 36.8% -7.0
Fire Aggro 7.0% 4 1-3-0 25.0% 37.5% 36.8% -8.5
Fire Crux Mage 4.7% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 44.1% -9.5
Fire Luxem Assassin 4.7% 1 0-0-1 50.0% 50.0% 49.0% -1.6
Fire Exia Jin 2.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 63.7% +21.9
Fire Umbra Ranger 2.3% 3 1-1-1 50.0% 50.0% 44.5% -4.1
Water Diana 2.3% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 39.9% -16.2
Water Neos 2.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 57.4% +11.8
Wind Allies 2.3% 0
Wind Crux Lorraine 2.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.5% +13.6
Wind Lorraine 2.3% 0
Wind Luxem Assassin 2.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.1% +14.6
Wind Overlord 2.3% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 53.3% +5.3
Decklists · 8 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 4 mirror matches (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 4 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

Winners more often ran: Song of Frost, Fractal of Refreshment, Turbo Charge. Losers more often ran: Frostbind.

Played more by winners
Song of Frost
Winning decks ran 1.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.5.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 3, the loser ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Fractal of Refreshment
Winning decks ran 2.0 copies on average, losing decks 2.0.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Turbo Charge
Winning decks ran 0.5 copies on average, losing decks 0.2.
Of 4 mirrors: the winner ran more in 2, the loser ran more in 1, both ran the same in 1.
Played more by losers
Frostbind
Losing decks ran 0.8 copies on average, winning decks 0.0.
Of 4 mirrors: the loser ran more in 3, the winner ran more in 0, both ran the same in 1.
Show all 18 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 14 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Song of Frost +0.75 3 0 1
Frostbind -0.75 0 3 0
Chill to the Bone -0.50 0 2 2
Lost in Thought +0.50 2 0 2
Fast Cure -0.50 0 2 2
Reprogram -0.50 0 2 0
Gildas, Chronicler of Aesa +0.25 1 0 3
Unstable Fractal +0.25 1 0 3
Fractal of Refreshment +0.25 2 1 1
Turbo Charge +0.25 2 1 0
Extricating Touch -0.25 0 1 0
Tariff Ring +0.25 1 0 3
Escape the Wreckage -0.25 0 1 0
Portentous Tanggu +0.25 1 0 3
Art of War +0.25 1 0 1
Staggering Strike -0.25 0 1 0
Captivating Opulence +0.00 1 1 2
Fractal of Intrusion +0.00 1 1 2

JSON: /api/events/25682/archetypes/Water Fractal